Around here, we normally at least ironically celebrate those accused of plagiarism. And hey, when a celebrity writes a successful book, especially a health/diet book, and some self-published writer no-one’s heard of claims plagiarism, I’m skeptical. One, because I don’t believe most celebrity are written by their “authors” and a professional ghost-writer is going to be careful about that sort of thing. And two, because any widespread success these days means a plagiarism lawsuit (see: Harry Potter, Da Vinci Code, Mrs. Seinfeld). But on the other hand, maybe if some celebridiot tried to write a book solo, they might not understand certain rules about writing and copyright and such. “Only little people pay attention to such things” or something. In this case, given my heavy heavy prejudice against and raging dislike of the “celebrity” in question, I’m hope the accusations are true and that they find the plaintiff’s book with all kinds of highlights and notes in the margins that say, “Steal this passage!” But obviously, that’s not an objective opinion. Though Hasselbeck is someone that works to inspire strong opinions – to find jurors that don’t already have strong feelings one way or another about her, they’re gonna have to work hard. It just goes to show: when you’re working for a cause, you’re not always going like everyone working alongside you.